Dance and Football

Editors Letters || Wednesday, 16 August, 2006

It's all very good stating the obvious, that footballers are paid ridiculous amounts to be crap in this country (face it they never actually do their job properly) but the problem remains that dance doesn't have the audience in this country that football has' the main reason being that dance isn't unpredictable and people can see dance for free on MTV.

There's no live atmosphere like there is with football because dance isn't interactive, so people won't be interested on a larger scale like they are with football. What we need is anoher theatrical revolution to reform dance in a way that makes it more entertaining and appealing to a larger audience, basically someone who can do what Brecht did for theatre.

Otherwise dance as an artform will never be as lucrative as football and therefore the job propescts will always be bad, but regardless people will still do it because we'd rather do this than being stuck in the rat race.

Carl Pattrick

I think you are taking the football analogy all wrong. It was not a reference to pay or popularity but to the pretense and tunnel vision of the game itself and its supporters.

I would also question just how football is in any way 'interactive' and just exactly where on MTV can you watch a dance performance of any kind?

"Where are the Dancers Reply" Previous | Main | Next"Where are the Dancers Reply (2)"
Published Wed, 16 Aug, 2006 at 03:55 | Share on Facebook | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Recent Material

©2008 Article19 Contemporary Dance Online All Rights Are Reserved | Contact | Terms of Service | About Article19